The word "Power" does not indicate it is meant for PowerBuilder.
Power BI, PowerQuery, PowerPoint, PowerShell, PowerAutomate and all the MS Power-suite of apps do not indicate they are related to PowerBuilder in anyway. They are being used by general / .NET community (and also PowerBuilder developers ).
Coining new brand names loses consistency. Appeon products should ideally start with "Power" so users could easily relate them to their tech-stack and ecosystem. It becomes easier to communicate the tech-stack to the management saying, "We're gonna use PowerBuilder, PowerServer and PowerSharp on our new Cloud project. On our 2-Tier project, we're gonna use PowerBuilder and PowerClient". It's becomes a bliss.
For PowerBuilder developers, "PowerSharp" readily makes sense - for all others, it is a really COOL brand name! SnapDevelop name doesn't indicate it is a C# IDE either. "Power" for consistency and some "Sharp" (or "#") in it would have been cooler. Just saying...
Not that this will result in brand-name change (and not that it is too late to change it either) but I'm just an uncompromising, quality-conscious and detail-oriented front-end guy using PowerBuilder for over 27 years