hello Guru
I am implementing the dynamic addition of PBL to my running program.
In particular, I add 3 libraries in one shot.
[code]
ls_ = GetLibraryList ( )
ls_temp = ls_pbl+","+ls_
li = Setlibrarylist(ls_temp)
[end code]
This is the result.
As you can see the reference to the * .EXE is repeated.
Correct that it works like this?
Thanks in advance for your reply
Gimmy
Gimmy, from your most recent post (I added the red outlines):
The first MessageBox shows the GetLibraryList() results, and the list begins with the exe, because as Richard said, this is way it has to be at execution time.
You then added pbl's to the beginning of the list without first removing the exe from the list, then pass that to SetLibraryList(). Since the list you supplied does not begin with the exe as it has to at execution time, PB prefaces the list you supplied with the exe... so now it is present in the list twice. This is why you are seeing what you are seeing.
If you have to/need to add PBL's to the beginning of the list and you want to correct this, you're going to have to parse and remove the exe from the list returned by GetLibraryList() BEFORE you set the new list.
HTH, John
THIS is the code. It is very simple.
I add the messagebox for show you the problem.
==========
string ls_temp, ls_,ls_pbl
integer li
if isnull(ls_pbl) or trim(ls_pbl) = '' Then return -1
ls_ = GetLibraryList ( )
messagebox('Ls_', ls_)
ls_temp = ls_pbl+","+ls_
messagebox('Ls_temp', ls_temp)
li = Setlibrarylist(ls_temp)
messagebox('Li', string(li))
ls_ = GetLibraryList ( )
messagebox('Ls_', ls_)
This is the messagebox
==============
The original library list
The new list
The return code
The new library list ( the exe is twice )
Hi Chris.
Where did you find the 2328 ?
i have:
Hi Gimmy;
FYI: I just did a test using my STD framework that logs the library list in the App's log by default. I changed the code to test the updating of the library list using a SetLibrayList(). In my test of the compiled 32bit P-Code App EXE, the EXE name only appears once afterwards, as follows:
Note that my test was done using PB2019 R2 build 2328.
HTH
Regards ... Chris
I think Gimmy is pointing this out because he wants to override an object that resides in the executable. The only way to do that is to extract the object from the application pbl and place it in a different one.