• You are here:  
  • Home
  • Q&A
  • Q&A
  • PowerBuilder
  • Modified dates of ALL PBDs were updated with pbc190 /i

Subscribe via RSS
Toggle Submenu
  1. Categories
  2. Recent
  3. Tags
View Replies (2)

Resolved Modified dates of ALL PBDs were updated with pbc190 /i

  1. Issue
0
Votes
Undo
  1. Sunhye Yoon
    Sunhye Yoon
  2. PowerBuilder
  3. Tuesday, 27 August 2019 02:33 AM UTC

Greetings,

I'm doing test pbc190 and pb2019.

In case of deploying in pb2019 by incremental, only updated pbl and pbd are updated.

But in case of pbc190 by incremental, all pbls and pbds are updated.

Is it bug of pbc190?

I want to update only modified date of updated pbl & pbd.

How can I do?

Nobody knows?

Thanks in advance.

 

 

PB 2019 can Save to SQL SERVER 2016 using IDE but ...
Windows Function to Connect NAS Drive is not worki...
Responses (2)
Roland Smith
Roland Smith Accepted Answer Pending Moderation
  1. Tuesday, 27 August 2019 18:10 PM UTC
  2. PowerBuilder
  3. # 1

When you save an object in the PBL, the source code and executable code are saved separately. When a PBD file is created, all it does is copy the executable code from the PBL file and puts it in the PBD file. That is why a rebuild (incremental or full) is done as a separate task.

The PBD build step should only occur for PBL files that were modified by the rebuild step.

Comment
Sunhye Yoon
  1. Sunhye Yoon
  2. Monday, 9 September 2019 01:29 AM UTC
You're right.

But in case of PBC190 (Stand Alone Compiler), Not only modified pbls but also unmodified pbls are compiled as pbds.

So that's issue.

Because It's problem in our office system.

Thank you for response and concern.
  1. Helpful
There are no comments made yet.
Chris Pollach @Appeon
Chris Pollach @Appeon Accepted Answer Pending Moderation
  1. Tuesday, 27 August 2019 16:34 PM UTC
  2. PowerBuilder
  3. # 2

Hi Sunye;

   I just did a PBC compilation with the "Incremental" switch on and it did re-build all the PBD's. It did not regenerate anything in any of my PBL's (dates stayed the same).

   If I perform the same "incremental" compilation from the IDE (I only tested 32bit) - only the PBD's that had an object change were affected by a date change.

Note: If no PBD's are present in the App's working folder(s) - then all the PBD's would have a new date - even on an "incremental" compilation.

   I would suggest opening a new Support Ticket for this issue. I do not see any current tickets around this issue.

HTH

Regards ... Chris

Comment
Sunhye Yoon
  1. Sunhye Yoon
  2. Monday, 9 September 2019 01:48 AM UTC
Thank you for your response and concern.

You're right. I have same problems.

What does a new Support Ticket means?

Not yet purchased. Before purchasing, I'm testing functions I want.

Regards..
  1. Helpful
Chris Pollach @Appeon
  1. Chris Pollach @Appeon
  2. Monday, 9 September 2019 14:32 PM UTC
Hi Sunhye;

If you discover what looks to be a genuine "bug" in any Appeon product, you can create a free "Support Ticket" that is open to the Appeon Support Team. They will verify if the issue as a legitimate bug and if so, inform the Engineering Team of the problem and then request a fix. You will then be able to track the bug and will be informed when Appeon releases an MR or "revision" that addresses this problem.

FYI: https://www.appeon.com/standardsupport

HTH

Regards ... Chris
  1. Helpful
There are no comments made yet.
  • Page :
  • 1


There are no replies made for this question yet.
However, you are not allowed to reply to this question.